Dea Cindy P.S.
135120207121003
Understanding Image
Restoration Strategies from a Stakeholder Approach
In this journal, author generally discussed
about how we can understanding image
restoration strategies through theory of social construction of reality
and stakeholder analysis approach in order to regain positive organization
image. At first, the journal talked about Thai crisis which was mostly is
political crisis. She has an opinion that, we can not applied image restoration
carelessly due to Thai context is eastern perspective which has different
belief, values, attitudes, and also different expectations among stakeholders. Kessadayurat
said, By adding social construction of reality, it was hoped to understand how
an organization’s image restoration strategies function in constructing its
image, as social reality, for people (Kessadayurat, 2011).
Secondly, the journal discussed about
crisis communication and organization image. In organizational image, crisis is
perceived as a threat. We will understand what kind of crisis that being faced
through variables that are normally found in the examination of a crisis and
the organization’s response. That is the reason communication within
organization is considered as a means to communicate organizational crisis
response strategies to its various publics. Threat arises from the extreme
discrepancy between the desired status of an organization, and the status under
which it is being. So, the organization have to monitor various possible
outcomes and responses. Also, the crisis manager should be able to give a
credible explanation within short time towards publics, stakeholders, and
related parties in order to save the organization’s image.
To reach an effective way, crisis
management needs to consider the importance of publics by shifting and
categorizing public. Generally, the way organization manage its crisis is
through preventive and restorative approaches. Kessadayurat (2011) said, In
preventive approach, issue management by an organization allows two-way
communication between organization and public to create mutual understanding.
But, restorative approaches is needed when an organization fails to detect issues
and it becomes a crisis.
Communication is considered as the
essential means to restore a person’s or organization’s image after the crisis.
image restoration strategy focuses primarily on the message factor, image
restoration deals with the process of communication. to understand the image
restoration message as communication process is through the perspective of
social construction; particularly, the theory of social construction of
reality. reviewing the original concept of social construction of reality would
provide a better understanding of how the theory may be applicable to the study
of image restoration. It’s regarding with how image is considered as socially
constructed reality through communication. language is used to influence one’s understanding
and perception towards an organization’s
image. Through interaction, communication plays an important role in assigning,
reinforcing and maintaining the social meaning for each individual based on
common knowledge. theory of social construction of reality will provide a clear
understanding of how strategic image restoration messages are communicated to
different group of stakeholder as to restore its image. theory of social
construction of reality can provide a clear understanding of how communication
influences and maintains one’s perception towards a subjective fact towards an organization,
socially-created reality, image or how image is considered as socially
constructed reality through communication.
Regarding with stakeholder theory,
there are 3 perspective in it. First is broad, focuses on the stakeholder in
terms of the mass of public opinion. Second,
narrow a priori, view the stakeholder as objective, or predetermined set
of stakeholders categories. Thrid, narrow situational approach which is more
fluid and flexible not fixed, depending on the situation. So the purpose of this journal is develop a deeper understanding
on image restoration.
Impact
Of Past Crises On Current Crisis Communication
In this
journal, author discussed about a deadly blast ripped in Phillips Petroleum Company
facility in Pasadena, Texas and how to overcome using Situational Crisis
Communication Theory. SCCT argues that whether people knowabout past crises is
an important consideration for crisis managers. Attribution theory holds that
people will make judgments about the causes of events,
especially unexpected events with negative outcomes. Attributions are perceptions
of the causality or the perceived reasons for a particular event’s occurrence. crisis
managers can use crisis response strategies in their attempts to shape
attributions of the crisis and/or perceptions of the organization itself. Attribution
theory provides the link necessary to match crisis response strategies with
a crisis situation. SCCT uses the attributions of responsibility to forge a
connection between crisis response strategies and the crisis situation.
Crisis responsibility, the degree to
which stakeholders attribute responsibility for a crisis to an organization, is
the centerpiece of SCCT. Attributions of crisis responsibility are directly
related to the reputational threat posed by a crisis. A history of similar
crises can indicate that a crisis is stable rather than unstable, thereby
increasing attributions of crisis responsibility. Most people receive
information about corporations through indirect experiences such as the news.
The use of newspaper articles as a stimulus matches well with how nonvictim
publics generally encounter a crisis. Areputation is developed through direct
and indirect experience with an organization. The information reported in the
media is given salience when the reputation is formed, that is, media coverage
can shape a reputation. What is reported about the crisis can have a profound
effect on the organization’s reputation.
When crises involved product tampering
and technical-error product recalls, respondents perceived the reputation of
the organization with a history of such crises as significantly more negative
than the reputation of an organization without past crises or with an unknown
history. The information indicating no past crises manipulation was minimally
successful and must be considered when interpreting the results. The product
tampering and workplace violence crisis scenarios were shown to generate high
attributions of external control and low perceptions of personal control. When
news media provide no information about past crises, stakeholders are likely to
assume there were no past crises. An organization wants to maintain a clean
crisis record because similar past crises will complicate the management of the
current crisis. A crisis originally considered a mild reputational threat moved
to the moderate threat level and a crisis originally considered a moderate
reputational threat moved to the severe threat level when the organization had
a history of crises.
The results showed a direct, negative
relationship between crisis history and organizational reputation. A history of
similar crises lowered perceptions of an organization’s reputation. The results
support an indirect relationship between crisis history and organization
reputation, too. The crisis history audit would provide reliable information on
the crisis history that could help to more accurately evaluate the reputational
threat posed by the current situation. Crisis managers always have the option
of trying to fight stakeholder attributions, using crisis response strategies
in an effort to alter attributions of crisis responsibility. An organization is
served better by accepting and working within the constraints of crisis
responsibility attributions. Future research should consider the difference
between crisis types and crisis clusters. Future research should
consider the difference between crisis types and crisis clusters.
To exercise control, a researcher has to select a set of variables to use and
exclude. SCCT suggest that crisis history should result in crisis managers selecting
response strategies that accept greater responsibility.
References:
Coombs, W. T. (2006). Impact of past crises on current crisis communication. Journal of Business Communication, 41 (3), 265-289.
Kessadayurat, C. (2011). Understanding image restoration strategies from a stakeholder approach. Bu Academic Review, 10 (1), 282-287.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar