Impact of past crises on current crisis communication by
Timothy Coombs and Understanding image restoration strategies from a
stakeholder approach by Chutima Kessadayurat
It is linked with a previous research based on Situational
Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT). This theory argue that history of crises is
critical to determine reputation threat. Also when the threat increase, crisis
manager should use strategy in response that demonstrate acceptance of crisis
responsibility. The journal explains of a study to test SCCT contention that
crisis history could affect to reputational threat. SCCT also focusing in
communication to protect organization’s reputation.
The hypotheses of SCCT argues that past crisis could shape
the current crisis and reputational threat as mention above. Hence SCCT was
made to follow the information as instructed.
Then Attribution theory also linked
as a guide the crisis situations to response strategies. Where attribution theory
is about people perceptions and crises will trigger attributions. Crisis attributions
affect feeling and behavior in organizations involved in crisis. Therefore crisis
manager could uses crisis response strategies attempt to construct attribution
crisis or perception of the organization itself.
In order to make attribution there are three attribution
dimensions. First is stability of the event happens. Second is external control
which indicates if the event is controllable or not. The third is personal
control which shows whether the events cause is controllable or not by other
person. Or the internal locus which reflects about a person and external locus
reflects the situation. Therefore attribution theory connecting crisis response
strategies with the crisis situation.
Crisis threat assessment divided into two steps. On the
first step they identify the crisis type. SCCT differs 10 crisis types: natural
disaster, rumor, product tampering, workplace violence, challenge, technical
error product recall, technical error accident, human error product recall,
human error accident, and organizational misdeed. Then attribution of crisis
responsibility divided various crisis types into three clusters include victim,
accidental and intentional. In victim cluster there are low attributions of
crisis responsibility such as natural disaster. The victim of the crisis is
organization. The accidental cluster contain minimal attributions of crisis
responsibility such as technical error. Then the intentional crisis cluster
needed strong attribution of crisis responsibility such as human error or
organizational misdeed. Next the second step to assess crisis threat is to
adjust the reputation from three points such as crisis history which the
organizations has in the past. Second is relationship history towards the
stakeholders. And the last is severity or the damage amount by accident.
Three studies regarding past crisis on SCCT were explained
in the journal. And it shows that the history of crisis condition creates more
crisis responsibility pressure and increasing the attributions. Thus it could
also gives the reputational threat. Research was conducted using 321 respondents.
They were given four crisis scenarios and questionnaire. The result shows that
respondents sees the no mention of crisis history as the same info as
information which indicates no crisis history. But when crises involve product
tampering and technical error product recalls respondents perceived the
reputation of the organization with a history of crises more negative rather
than the reputation of organization without past crisis or unknown history. So in
conclusion if news media doesn’t blow up information regarding past crisis,
stakeholders will assume there were no past crises. An organization needed to
maintain clean crisis record because similar past crises will affect current
crises.
Then in image restoration strategies journal highlighting
the significance of stakeholders in designing restoration message. First the
writer focuses on crisis communication and organization image. The variables of
crises can be seen from its threat, short response time, and then surprise is
one of crisis characteristic. The writer argues that organizations can manage
crisis in two way. Taking preventive way or restorative approach. In preventive
it allows two way communication between organization and public to create
understanding. Issue management also necessary and public relations are
responsible for developing crisis management team.
In Benoit’s 5 restoration strategy the first step is denial.
There are simple denial and shift to blame. Second is evasion of responsibility
which allow to manipulate public perception. And there are four tactics in evasion
such as provocation, defeasibility, accident and good intention. Third is reduce
the offensiveness of the act with bolster, minimize differentiate, transcend,
attack accuser and compensate. Fourth is corrective action which concerns
attempt to repair damage by action. And the last is mortification which occurs
in asking for forgiveness.
In linking with four assumptions of theory of social
construction reality, shows that the theory is connected with image
restoration. The assumptions contains reality through human experience,
language determined by social interactions, reality defined by conventions of
communication and communication behavior linked social construction of reality.
Therefore the theory explains how communication maintain and provide people perception
towards organization. And how image is considered as socially constructed
trough communication. And the way organization communicates its restoring image
represents the reconstruction of reality.
Understanding stakeholder interpretation in constructing
reality of image restoration is very important. In conclusion this article
shows how image restoration message function. Which use communication to create
reality and language is reality image construction. Which is really matter in
restoring image strategies.
By Iriene Muharani
125120207121014
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar